Identifying and Outing Closet Genocidal Authoritarians On Social Media – Jim Hankins (@fincaelsordo)

by Owner | May 24, 2024

While there are many different types of Gun Control puppets reaching all corners of social media, one of the most prominent are those actually described by Malcom X, the White Liberal.

“Now the White liberals aren’t White people who are for independence, who are liberal, who are moral, who are ethical in their thinking, they are just a faction of White people who are jockeying for power…”
Malcom X

The key words above, “jockeying for power,” is what this article focuses on. Specifically in this case, surfing on the coffins of dead people to try and obtain that power. Many times, race plays a critical part in the identity of these perpetrators. We see this all over the internet. Most famously, straight from the mouth of our 46th President in his campaign for Presidency.

If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black
Joseph Biden

Now, we all know Mr. Biden’s stance on Gun Control: a complete and authoritarian approach of total denial of privately owned firearms and the dismantling of the 2nd Amendment. An approach much akin to other authoritarians who committed mass genocides of their political opposition after disarming the citizenry of their respective nations and regions, such as:

1911: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk of Turkey; citizens disarmed – 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered
1929: Vladimir Lenin & Joseph Stalin of Russia; citizens disarmed – 20 million Russians murdered
1935: Mao of China; citizens disarmed – 20 million Chinese killed
1938: Adolf Hitler of Germany; citizens disarmed – 6 million Jews murdered
1956: Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia; citizens disarmed – 1 million “intellectuals” killed
1964: Enrique Peralta Azurdia of Guatemala (with US support); citizens disarmed – 100,000 Mayan Indians massacred
1970: Idi Amin of Uganda; citizens disarmed – 300,000 Christians put to death

If you are like me, you may have asked yourself many times, how could someone in Germany in 1938 actually believe that Jewish people were so horrible that they needed to be rounded up, shoved into cattle cars, hauled off to concentration camps and then worked to death, experimented on, or just straight up exterminated. Well, you need look no further than X, formerly Twitter.

This specific use case will focus on one particular authoritarian power hungry shill, Jim Hankins. Jim goes by the X handle fincaelsordo and his entire identity is wrapped up in gun control. While he pretends he cares about safety, his goal is really to spread fear, hatred and division based on race in order to attempt to push gun control measures. In Jim’s case, he specifically targets primarily white perpetrators while, not just ignoring, but entirely deflecting conversations that include people who are not white. When asked about implementing safety measures, he also deflects. Most of these deflections are centered around his desire to see the militarized state murder his political opposition.

There were several other posts he had made regarding his wish to see white parents prosecuted for children obtaining firearms, but completely ignored requests for him to call for the same on a recent negligent discharge for an underage (17 year old) black rapper who shot himself in the head filming a live feed session with fans. When asked why he wasn’t making the same calls for this poor kids parents to be prosecuted for providing him with a handgun, he simply ignored several of them.

Here, you can see he essentially mocks this young mans death saying;

he had a gun; it didn’t save his life
Jim Hankins

He then deflects and accuses me of wanting this poor kid to die while he mocks his death.

Original Post: https://x.com/fincaelsordo/status/1792680024178659710

Here you can see he completely ignores a request to discuss the parents responsibility of the death of Rylo, a black child, while railing against the parents of a white child.

Initial Post: https://x.com/fincaelsordo/status/1793447703877472666

Question: https://x.com/ReactSafe/status/1793473927815307690

Now that we have established that Mr. Hankins is an obvious racist who prefers to mock the death of a black teenager and hold no one accountable for his death, including the parents who allowed him to possess it while demanding that the parents of the white child who was shot in the hand be sent to prison and be held accountable for the injury.

Things go even further south from here. We find out in a later thread that Mr. Hankins has a whole lot in common with the Nazis of 1930’s Germany when confronted in a post where he is celebrating the death of Bryan Malinowski.

Jim posts “Guns Suck” and proceeds to celebrate government agents killing a man who was selling his own private property that was never used to commit any crimes, harm anyone or anything else negative. He begins celebrating the death of Bryan Malinowski.

When asked why he is celebrating the death of an innocent man at the hands of a tyrannical government agency, he refuses to answer the question and proceeds to proclaim that owning a firearm means you deserve to get murdered.

He goes on to falsely claim that threats were made, and then when asked where that information came from, he goes silent.

Original Post: https://x.com/fincaelsordo/status/1792314401586074054

In a more recent interaction, he again calls for the prosecution of the owner of the firearm that was used in an accidental shooting and continues to ignore Rylo’s tragic death.

Original post: https://x.com/fincaelsordo/status/1793815430836220194

But this time, he gives us further proof that if he lived in Germany in 1938, he’d be the first one turning in Jewish people to the Nazi government for extermination.

He initially deflects and tries to bring up a different shooting than Rylos, so I brought him back on track and asked him about safety vs. control and gave him a link to my 10 rules to live by. Instead of responding to the question. He goes on with multiple posts mocking the death of Mr. Malinowski and apparently trying to goad some sort of emotional response from me rather than answer the question posed about being for safety or control.

And then attempts to discredit me, and fails miserably. He then stops communicating on this thread.

As we move over to another thread where he mocks the murder of Mr. Malinowski stating again:

He had a bunch of guns and they didn’t save his life
Jim Hankins

Original Post: https://x.com/fincaelsordo/status/1793776358642086374

When confronted with the facts that these were government guns that did the killing that ATF did not follow proper procedures and failed to wear body cams during the raid and asked to respond about how bad the government was for breaking it’s own rules, his response was to further mock the death of an innocent gun owner and again when asked to specify if his intentions were safety or control, he just goads with more pro-government murder posts.